TEAM
Development and pathologies of neuromuscular circuits
Group leader : F. Helmbacher
Research in our team aims to understand processes that control the development of neuromuscular circuits, and to uncover how alterations of these developmental processes lead to devastating neuromuscular pathologies in human.
FOR BEGINNERS
Research in our team aims to understand processes that control the development of neuromuscular circuits, and to uncover how alterations of these developmental processes lead to devastating neuromuscular pathologies in human.
We investigate the mechanisms that shape skeletal muscles and coordinate connectivity between spinal motor neurons and muscles, an essential process for the control of locomotion. Our current work focuses on the role of adhesion molecules controlling both neuronal connectivity and muscle shape, and owing to this work, have recently discovered the roots of a human myopathy: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
We tackle these questions by combining modern techniques of mouse genetics, imaging, bioinformatics and functional genomics, and have teamed up with human geneticists and pathologists, so as to design murine models of human neuromuscular pathologies such as FSHD.
FOR SPECIALISTS
One of the key questions in neurosciences is to understand the mechanisms involved in the assembly of complex circuitry. The big principles implied by this question are also found in circuits much simpler than brain circuits, and we have chosen to focus on the assembly of neuromuscular circuits for their relative simplicity. The organization of motor projections from motor neurons towards muscles is on one side stereotyped, based on the existence of a topographic link between the position of neurons in the spinal cord and that of their target muscles in the body. On the other side this organization is complex, since the multiplicity of tasks and movements the body is meant to execute is accompanied by a large functional and geographical diversity of muscles and neurons. Thus, understanding mechanisms that harmoniously orchestrate neuromuscular connectivity requires to integrate notions such as cell fate diversity (both on the neuronal and muscular side) and mutual dependency, and to focus on the identification of signals successively exchanged during development. We thus study the signals acting on specification, axonal guidance, muscle migration/morphogenesis, signals allowing numerical control of the size of each neuromuscular unit (muscle and corresponding motor pool, through regulation of neuronal survival or muscle growth), and finally signals integrating functional activity.
To understand how these circuits are connected and shaped, 1) we use genetic markers of subpopulations of motor neurons or muscles, 2) we try to identify signaling molecules exchanged by muscles and motor neurons and involved in the different phases of neuromuscular assembly, and 3) we use genetic methods to manipulate the functions of these molecules so as to determine the anatomical and functional consequences of these alterations.
1- A major effort aim is to identify molecules involved in the assembly of neuromuscular connectivity. We focus in particular on signaling cues and their receptors, such as ephrins and Eph Receptors, such as neurotrophic factors and their tyrosine kinase receptors (HGF/Met; GDNF/Ret, etc), and more recently on adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily, such as the FAT and DACHSOUS protocadherins.
2- It is common for many of these signaling molecules to act simultaneously in neurons and in their targets, by eliciting distinct but complementary biological responses. For example HGF/Met signaling is required to controls both muscle migration and several aspects of motor neuron biology (axon guidance, specification, survival). Thus, to be able to distinguish their respective actions on the various cell types involved in the neuromuscular construction, we used advanced molecular genetics to ablate their functions in a tissue specific manner.
3- Our recent studies on the role of the protocadherin FAT1 in muscular development have identified FAT1 for its key role in the pathophysiology of a human myopathy, facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD), a hereditary condition leading to regionalized muscle wasting (Caruso et al., PLOS Genetics, 2013). In brief, ous results suggest that a tissue-specific deregulation of FAT1, by perturbing is early role in muscle morphogenesis, has the potential to phenotype surprisingly identical to the most characteristic clinical symptoms of FSHD, including not only regionalized muscle wasting, but also vascular retinopathy. Our objectives are to define to which extent and in which cell type depletion of FAT1 (and the resulting signaling consequences) are likely to contribute to FSHD symptoms, thus identifying mechanistic nods that qualify as optimal therapeutic targets.
Ultimately, these studies will lead to developing therapeutic strategies applicable in patients with neuromuscular disorders, meant to bypass the consequences of a developmental mistake.
Selected publications
PUBLICATION
January 22nd, 2022
Astrocyte-intrinsic and -extrinsic Fat1 activities regulate astrocyte development and angiogenesis in the retina
PUBLICATION
May 30th, 2018
Tissue-specific activities of the Fat1 cadherin cooperate to control neuromuscular morphogenesis.
PUBLICATION
October 9th, 2016
Coordination of signalling networks and tumorigenic properties by ABL in glioblastoma cells
PUBLICATION
September 22nd, 2015
Tissue-Specific Gain of RTK Signalling Uncovers Selective Cell Vulnerability during Embryogenesis.
PUBLICATION
September 1st, 2015
Correlation between low FAT1 expression and early affected muscle in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
PUBLICATION
August 1st, 2015
Stromal Fat4 acts non-autonomously with Dchs1/2 to restrict the nephron progenitor pool.
PUBLICATION
April 15th, 2015
Identification of variants in the 4q35 gene FAT1 in patients with a facioscapulohumeral dystrophy-like phenotype.
PUBLICATION
September 17th, 2014
Celsr3 is required in motor neurons to steer their axons in the hindlimb.
PUBLICATION
August 14th, 2014
Plasticity versus specificity in RTK signalling modalities for distinct biological outcomes in motor neurons
PUBLICATION
June 9th, 2013
Deregulation of the Protocadherin Gene FAT1 Alters Muscle Shapes: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy.
PUBLICATION
September 1st, 2012
gdnf activates midline repulsion by Semaphorin3B via NCAM during commissural axon guidance.
PUBLICATION
August 3rd, 2011
Pool-specific regulation of motor neuron survival by neurotrophic support.
PUBLICATION
March 17th, 2011
Enhanced neuronal Met signalling levels in ALS mice delay disease onset.
PUBLICATION
September 15th, 2010
Hepatocyte growth factor-Met signaling is required for Runx1 extinction and peptidergic differentiation in primary nociceptive neurons.
PUBLICATION
April 1st, 2006
Cooperation between GDNF/Ret and ephrinA/EphA4 signals for motor-axon pathway selection in the limb.
PUBLICATION
August 28th, 2003
Met signaling is required for recruitment of motor neurons to PEA3-positive motor pools.
PUBLICATION
June 1st, 2001
Coupling Met to specific pathways results in distinct developmental outcomes.
PUBLICATION
January 1st, 2001
The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand ephrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not cranial neural crest migration.
PUBLICATION
January 1st, 2001
Forward signaling mediated by ephrin-B3 prevents contralateral corticospinal axons from recrossing the spinal cord midline.
PUBLICATION
August 1st, 2000
Targeting of the EphA4 tyrosine kinase receptor affects dorsal/ventral pathfinding of limb motor axons.
Powerpoint support for nervous system development and pathologies classes – 2013 (in french)
Helmbacher M1 Devt-patho-Neuro 2013
Powerpoint support for cellular decision classes – 2013 (in french)
Helmbacher M1 Cellular Decision 2013